Golden Pedobear Award 2016

Section of the forum for English discussion about pedophilia.
Uživatelský avatar
simgiran
Čestný člen skupiny ČEPEK
Líbí se mi: Chlapci a ženy
ve věku od: 8
ve věku do: 15
Kontakt: e-mail: [email protected]
Výkřik do tmy: Jsem produkt dekadentního světonázoru a jakožto takový na slepé větvi vývoje.
Příspěvky: 1276
Dal: 465 poděkování
Dostal: 566 poděkování

Golden Pedobear Award 2016

Nový příspěvek od simgiran »

I would like to announce the Golden Pedobear Award 2016. Please, try to avoid off-topic discussion in this topic.

Basic rules and guidelines (last update: February 26th, 2016)
  • The goal of the award is to highlight stigmatization of pedophiles in media by awarding the most stupid article(s) about pedophilia and/or pedophiles.
  • The award is annual. Only materials published during the year 2016 can be nominated. The nominations are closed on January 31st, 2017.
  • Various types of media pieces can be announced. Article in news, and article on a website of an influential organization, a radio piece, a TV documentary, a video on a news server, a video on YouTube on some major YouTube channel etc.
  • Only pieces that reach the wide public should be nominated. Pieces that are only read/viewed/listened by a few people should be avoided. Possible excuses: The piece is so stupid that it is funny. The piece was created by some prominent author (people from mental health area, a well-known medical doctor, politician etc.) Pieces from obviously crazy sources (right wing nuts, conspiratards) should be avoided. (Unless they are really funny, of course.)
  • The stupidity of the piece shouldn't consist solely of misusing the term pedophile for child molesters or pedophilia for child molestation. Unless the author of the article is a mental health professional (or possibly a medical doctor in general or the piece comes from a public institution).
  • The nominated piece has to be available to wide public.
  • Only media pieces in English can be nominated.
  • The nomination can be done by linking the piece in this topic (or if it isn't available online, by describing it source and providing evidence - a scan of an article in news etc.)
  • Anyone can nominate a piece. Feel free to share information about this competition.
Nominations (last update: June 27th, 2016) A ways to nominate a piece (last update: February 26th, 2016)
  • Replying to this topic
  • E-mail: sending the nomination to [email protected]
  • Twitter: tweeting the nomination mentioning @simgiran or sending a DM to him
Uživatelský avatar
simgiran
Čestný člen skupiny ČEPEK
Líbí se mi: Chlapci a ženy
ve věku od: 8
ve věku do: 15
Kontakt: e-mail: [email protected]
Výkřik do tmy: Jsem produkt dekadentního světonázoru a jakožto takový na slepé větvi vývoje.
Příspěvky: 1276
Dal: 465 poděkování
Dostal: 566 poděkování

Re: Golden Pedobear Award 2016

Nový příspěvek od simgiran »

Update: A new nomination added, recent nomination cancelled due to quick retraction of nominated article, one older nominated article not found at the source website (but can be found using Wayback Machine).
Uživatelský avatar
simgiran
Čestný člen skupiny ČEPEK
Líbí se mi: Chlapci a ženy
ve věku od: 8
ve věku do: 15
Kontakt: e-mail: [email protected]
Výkřik do tmy: Jsem produkt dekadentního světonázoru a jakožto takový na slepé větvi vývoje.
Příspěvky: 1276
Dal: 465 poděkování
Dostal: 566 poděkování

Re: Golden Pedobear Award 2016

Nový příspěvek od simgiran »

New nomination by TNF 13 from Twitter: Media acclimatizing us to pedophilia

RT is known for its propaganda but I decided it does not meet exclusion criteria because it has large influence, the propaganda is not so clear (the content is not 100% BS) and it's state driven.